Andrews v Short Brothers PLC [2008] NIIT 705_03IT (16 January 2008)
The claimant's application, though lacking explicit reference to disability discrimination, contains sufficient particulars to include a claim of unlawful discrimination under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, based on specific allegations relating to his illness and redundancy assessment.
- Citation
- [2008] NIIT 705_03IT
- Parties
- Claimant: Lawrence Andrews; Respondent: Short Brothers PLC
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal Pre Hearing Review / Pre Hearing Review Decision
- Outcome
- Claimant's application includes a claim of unlawful disability discrimination; respondent granted leave to amend response.
- Legal Topics
- Disability Discrimination, Redundancy, Unfair Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lawrence Andrews
Claimant
Short Brothers PLC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal Pre Hearing Review / Pre Hearing Review Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant's application contains an allegation of disability discrimination
- 2 Whether the application can be amended to include an allegation of unlawful disability discrimination
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant's application, though lacking explicit reference to disability discrimination, contains sufficient particulars to include a claim of unlawful discrimination under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, based on specific allegations relating to his illness and redundancy assessment.
Court Disposition
Claimant's application includes a claim of unlawful disability discrimination; respondent granted leave to amend response.
Orders
- Respondent given leave to amend its response within 21 days to set out grounds for resisting the disability discrimination claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment