Allen v Blakely & Ors [2005] NIIT 2827_04 (24 March 2005)
The tribunal found the effective date of termination was 4 July 2004, not 21 October 2004, and the applicant failed to lodge his complaint within three months, barring claims against the second respondent. However, the applicant was entitled to holiday pay and notice pay from the third respondent under Article...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] NIIT 2827_04
- Parties
- Applicant: Stephen Allen; Respondent: Stephen Blakely; Respondent: Blackstaff Construction Limited; Respondent: Department for Employment and Learning
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 24 March 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Claim / Final Decision
- Outcome
- partially allowed
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy Payment, Holiday Pay, Pay in Lieu of Notice, Limitation Period
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephen Allen
Applicant
Stephen Blakely
Respondent
Blackstaff Construction Limited
Respondent
Department for Employment and Learning
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Claim / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to redundancy payment, unpaid holiday pay, and pay in lieu of notice
- 2 Whether the claim was lodged within the statutory time limit
- 3 Whether the Department for Employment and Learning is liable for certain payments
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found the effective date of termination was 4 July 2004, not 21 October 2004, and the applicant failed to lodge his complaint within three months, barring claims against the second respondent. However, the applicant was entitled to holiday pay and notice pay from the third respondent under Article 233(1) of the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order 1996.
Court Disposition
partially allowed
Orders
- The third respondent is to pay the applicant £540.00 for ten days holiday pay and £23.80 for pay in lieu of notice, totalling £563.80.
- The first respondent is dismissed from the proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment