Stevenson v Sting Publishing Limited [2010] NIIT 6654_09IT (11 May 2010)

Stevenson v Sting Publishing Limited [2010] NIIT 6654_09IT (11 May 2010)

The tribunal found no actual or anticipatory breach of contract by the respondent. The respondent's conduct, including the suspension and investigatory process, did not amount to a repudiatory breach of the implied term of trust and confidence. Even if there was ambiguity in correspondence, the respondent's...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] NIIT 6654_09IT
Parties
Claimant: Gillian Diane Stevenson; Respondent: Sting Publishing Limited
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
11 May 2010
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal Unfair Dismissal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Constructive Dismissal, Unfair Dismissal, Employment Contract, Implied Term of Trust and Confidence, Statutory Dispute Resolution Procedures
Employment Law Constructive Dismissal Unfair Dismissal Employment Contract Implied Term of Trust and Confidence Statutory Dispute Resolution Procedures

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gillian Diane Stevenson

Claimant

Sting Publishing Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal Unfair Dismissal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Was the claimant dismissed within the meaning of Article 127 of the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order 1996?
  2. 2 If so, was the dismissal unfair?

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found no actual or anticipatory breach of contract by the respondent. The respondent's conduct, including the suspension and investigatory process, did not amount to a repudiatory breach of the implied term of trust and confidence. Even if there was ambiguity in correspondence, the respondent's subsequent actions clarified the process and withdrew any threat of breach. The claimant was not entitled to terminate her contract without notice by reason of the respondent's conduct; therefore, there was no dismissal and the claim for unfair dismissal fails.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed