Sutton Services International Ltd v Vaughan Engineering Services Ltd [2013] NIQB 63 (20 May 2013)

Defendant established reasonable grounds for concern about plaintiff's ability to repay and adequacy of insurance; stay granted on balance of award subject to conditions regarding payment and progress of defendant's claim.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2013] NIQB 63
Parties: Plaintiff: Sutton Services International Ltd; Defendant: Vaughan Engineering Services Ltd
Jurisdiction: Northern Ireland
Judgment Date: 20 May 2013
Procedural Posture: Commercial Summary Judgment Application / Post Adjudicator's Award, Application for Stay
Outcome: judgment for plaintiff with conditional stay on balance of award
Legal Topics: Adjudication Enforcement, Stay of Judgment, Financial Risk, Insurance Coverage

Construction Law Commercial Law Adjudication Enforcement Stay of Judgment Financial Risk Insurance Coverage

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 12

Parties

Sutton Services International Ltd

Plaintiff

Vaughan Engineering Services Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Summary Judgment Application / Post Adjudicator's Award, Application for Stay

Legal Issues

1 Should a stay be granted on enforcement of an adjudicator's award due to the plaintiff's financial position and insurance coverage?
2 Has the defendant established reasonable grounds for concern regarding the plaintiff's ability to repay if required by final outcome?

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

judgment for plaintiff with conditional stay on balance of award

Orders

Judgment for plaintiff for amount of adjudicator's award and interest.
Payment of £150,000 to plaintiff within 3 days.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.