Souare v Sword Security (NI) Ltd [2016] NIIT 00368_16IT (29 April 2016)
The tribunal found the claimant's claims for unlawful deduction of wages and unpaid wages to be well-founded and ordered payment of the specified sums.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] NIIT 00368_16IT
- Parties
- Claimant: Cheikh Souare; Respondent: Sword Security (NI) Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Unlawful Deduction of Wages, Unpaid Wages
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cheikh Souare
Claimant
Sword Security (NI) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages
- 2 Whether the respondent failed to pay wages due to the claimant
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found the claimant's claims for unlawful deduction of wages and unpaid wages to be well-founded and ordered payment of the specified sums.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed
Orders
- Respondent to pay claimant £127.50 for unlawful deduction of wages
- Respondent to pay claimant £26.80 for unpaid wages
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions >> Souare v Sword Security (NI) Ltd [2016] NIIT 00368_16IT (29 April 2016) URL: https://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIIT/2016/00368_16IT.html Cite as: [2016] NIIT 00368_16IT, [2016] NIIT 368_16IT [ New search ] [ Printable RTF version ] [ Help ] THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALS CASE REF: 368/16 CLAIMANT: Cheikh Souare RESPONDENT: Sword Security (NI) Ltd DECISION The decision of the tribunal is that: (A) The claimant's claim in respect of unlawful deduction of wages is well-founded. It is ordered that the respondent shall pay to the claimant the sum of £127.50 in respect of those deductions. (B) The claimant's claim in respect of unpaid wages is well-founded. It is ordered that the respondent shall pay to the claimant the sum of £26.80 in respect of those unpaid wages. Constitution of Tribunal: Employment Judge (sitting alone): Employment Judge Buggy Members: Appearances: The claimant was self-represented. The respondent was represented by Mr Tom Sheridan of Peninsula Business Services Ltd. REASONS 1. I announced my decision at the end of the hearing. At the same time, I gave brief oral reasons for that decision. 2. This is a relevant decision for the purposes of the Industrial Tribunals (Interest) Order (Northern Ireland) 1990. Employment Judge: Date and place of hearing: 28 April 2016, Belfast. Date decision recorded in register and issued to parties: BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIIT/2016/00368_16IT.html