Miskelly v The Restaurant Group (UK) Ltd [2012] NIIT 02195_11IT (20 July 2012)

Miskelly v The Restaurant Group (UK) Ltd [2012] NIIT 02195_11IT (20 July 2012)

The tribunal found no evidence that the claimant was treated less favourably on grounds of nationality, nor that any acts of indirect discrimination, victimisation, or protected disclosure occurred. The respondent provided cogent, non-discriminatory reasons for its actions. The claimant's dismissal was due to performance concerns, not unlawful discrimination or breach of contract.

Citation
[2012] NIIT 02195_11IT
Parties
Claimant: Jonathan Miskelly; Respondent: The Restaurant Group (UK) Ltd
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
20 July 2012
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome
All claims dismissed
Legal Topics
Racial Discrimination, Victimisation, Breach of Contract, Unfair Dismissal, Protected Disclosure (whistleblowing)
Employment Law Equality Law Racial Discrimination Victimisation Breach of Contract Unfair Dismissal Protected Disclosure (whistleblowing)

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 7 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jonathan Miskelly

Claimant

The Restaurant Group (UK) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was subjected to less favourable treatment on grounds of nationality (direct discrimination)
  2. 2 Whether the claimant was subjected to indirect discrimination on grounds of nationality
  3. 3 Whether the claimant was victimised for a protected act under the Race Relations (Northern Ireland) Order 1997

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found no evidence that the claimant was treated less favourably on grounds of nationality, nor that any acts of indirect discrimination, victimisation, or protected disclosure occurred. The respondent provided cogent, non-discriminatory reasons for its actions. The claimant's dismissal was due to performance concerns, not unlawful discrimination or breach of contract.

Court Disposition

All claims dismissed