King v Thomas McCartney [2011] NIIT 01928_10IT (05 April 2011)

King v Thomas McCartney [2011] NIIT 01928_10IT (05 April 2011)

The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy without notice or pay in lieu of notice. Under Article 118(1)(c) of the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order 1996, he was entitled to twelve weeks’ notice pay, not thirteen, as his period of continuous employment was thirteen years. The tribunal awarded £601, reflecting twelve weeks’ notice pay.

Citation
[2011] NIIT 01928_10IT
Parties
Claimant: Martin King; Respondent: Thomas McCartney
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
05 April 2011
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Decision
Outcome
claim allowed
Legal Topics
Notice Pay, Redundancy, Dismissal, Statutory Notice Period
Employment Law Notice Pay Redundancy Dismissal Statutory Notice Period

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Martin King

Claimant

Thomas McCartney

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was entitled to notice pay upon dismissal by reason of redundancy
  2. 2 Whether the correct statutory notice period was applied

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy without notice or pay in lieu of notice. Under Article 118(1)(c) of the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order 1996, he was entitled to twelve weeks’ notice pay, not thirteen, as his period of continuous employment was thirteen years. The tribunal awarded £601, reflecting twelve weeks’ notice pay.

Court Disposition

claim allowed

Orders

  • Respondent to pay claimant £601 in respect of notice pay.