Abernethy, R v [2003] NICC 14 (22 September 2003)

Abernethy, R v [2003] NICC 14 (22 September 2003)

The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the gunman or otherwise criminally involved, as identification evidence did not match, forensic evidence was inconclusive and possibly contaminated, and the possibility of guilt was insufficient for conviction.

Citation
[2003] NICC 14
Parties
Prosecution: The Queen; Defendant: Thomas Noel Abernethy
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
22 September 2003
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Trial Judgment
Outcome
acquittal
Legal Topics
Attempted Murder, Forensic Evidence, Identification Evidence, Burden of Proof, Contamination of Evidence
Criminal Law Attempted Murder Forensic Evidence Identification Evidence Burden of Proof Contamination of Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Queen

Prosecution

Thomas Noel Abernethy

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Trial Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the accused was the gunman responsible for the attempted murder of two police officers and the shooting of a civilian at a polling station
  2. 2 Whether forensic and identification evidence sufficiently linked the accused to the crime beyond reasonable doubt
  3. 3 Whether contamination of forensic evidence undermined the prosecution case

Ratio Decidendi

The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the gunman or otherwise criminally involved, as identification evidence did not match, forensic evidence was inconclusive and possibly contaminated, and the possibility of guilt was insufficient for conviction.

Court Disposition

acquittal

Orders

  • The accused, Thomas Noel Abernethy, is found Not Guilty of all charges.