McEntee, R. v [2018] NICC 12 (28 June 2018)
Given the defendant's diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia and substantial impairment of rational judgment at the time of the offences, a hospital order is not appropriate as his illness is in remission and does not warrant continued detention in hospital. The defendant presents a significant risk of serious harm to the public if not managed indefinitely, meeting the statutory test for dangerousness. The gravity of the double killing of two elderly victims in a frenzied attack justifies a discretionary life sentence with a minimum tariff of ten years, reflecting both the seriousness of the offence and the defendant's diminished but more than minimal culpability.
- Citation
- [2018] NICC 12
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Crown; Defendant: Thomas Scott McEntee
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing Judgment After Guilty Plea to Manslaughter on Grounds of Diminished Responsibility and Related Offences
- Outcome
- Defendant sentenced to life imprisonment for two counts of manslaughter by diminished responsibility, with a minimum tariff of ten years, and concurrent sentences for related offences.
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter by Diminished Responsibility, Sentencing, Dangerousness Assessment, Hospital Order, Life Imprisonment, Concurrent Sentences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Crown
Prosecution
Thomas Scott McEntee
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Judgment After Guilty Plea to Manslaughter on Grounds of Diminished Responsibility and Related Offences
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a hospital order or custodial sentence is appropriate for manslaughter by diminished responsibility
- 2 Whether the defendant meets the statutory test for dangerousness under the Criminal Justice (Northern Ireland) Order 2008
- 3 Whether a discretionary life sentence is justified given the seriousness of the offence and the defendant's culpability
Ratio Decidendi
Given the defendant's diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia and substantial impairment of rational judgment at the time of the offences, a hospital order is not appropriate as his illness is in remission and does not warrant continued detention in hospital. The defendant presents a significant risk of serious harm to the public if not managed indefinitely, meeting the statutory test for dangerousness. The gravity of the double killing of two elderly victims in a frenzied attack justifies a discretionary life sentence with a minimum tariff of ten years, reflecting both the seriousness of the offence and the defendant's diminished but more than minimal culpability.
Court Disposition
Defendant sentenced to life imprisonment for two counts of manslaughter by diminished responsibility, with a minimum tariff of ten years, and concurrent sentences for related offences.
Orders
- Life imprisonment with a minimum tariff of ten years on each of Counts 6 and 7 (manslaughter) to run concurrently
- One year imprisonment on Count 1 (burglary)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment