Martin v Translink (NIR) [2009] NIFET 141_08FET (09 March 2009)
The Tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence regarding non-receipt of correspondence and intention to pursue the claim, declined to strike out the claim, and refused to make an order for costs given the claimant's unrepresented status and actions via CAB.
- Citation
- [2009] NIFET 141_08FET
- Parties
- Claimant: William Martin; Respondent: Translink (NIR)
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Fair Employment Tribunal Pre Hearing Review / Pre Hearing Review Decision
- Outcome
- Claim not struck out; no order for costs; case-management directions issued.
- Legal Topics
- Fair Employment, Religious Discrimination, Political Belief Discrimination, Case Management, Strike Out Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Martin
Claimant
Translink (NIR)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Fair Employment Tribunal Pre Hearing Review / Pre Hearing Review Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Was the claimant less favourably treated?
- 2 Was he subject to a detriment?
- 3 Was it because of his religion or political belief?
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence regarding non-receipt of correspondence and intention to pursue the claim, declined to strike out the claim, and refused to make an order for costs given the claimant's unrepresented status and actions via CAB.
Court Disposition
Claim not struck out; no order for costs; case-management directions issued.
Orders
- Order for Additional Information against claimant to be complied with by 27 March 2009.
- Orders for Discovery and Inspection against each party to be complied with by 27 March 2009.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment