Duffy v Ulsterbus Ltd [2007] NIFET 84_01 (30 March 2007)
The Tribunal found, on the balance of probabilities, that the claimant was subjected to unlawful discrimination on grounds of religious belief and victimisation by the respondent, but was not unfairly dismissed. The respondent failed to provide a harmonious working environment and did not adequately address...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] NIFET 84_01
- Parties
- Claimant: Gerald Duffy; Respondent: Ulsterbus Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Fair Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim upheld in part; discrimination and victimisation proven; unfair dismissal claim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Religious Discrimination, Victimisation, Constructive Dismissal, Harassment, Compensation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gerald Duffy
Claimant
Ulsterbus Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Fair Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unlawfully discriminated against on grounds of religious belief
- 2 Whether the claimant was victimised by the respondent
- 3 Whether the claimant was constructively dismissed
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found, on the balance of probabilities, that the claimant was subjected to unlawful discrimination on grounds of religious belief and victimisation by the respondent, but was not unfairly dismissed. The respondent failed to provide a harmonious working environment and did not adequately address sectarian harassment.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld in part; discrimination and victimisation proven; unfair dismissal claim dismissed.
Orders
- Respondent ordered to pay claimant £59,211.69 compensation for discrimination (84/01FET).
- Respondent ordered to pay claimant £19,950.00 compensation for discrimination and victimisation (28/02FET and 140/02).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment