O'Kane v United Hospitals Trust [2005] NIIT 875_03 (30 June 2005)
The claimant failed to establish any act or omission by the respondent amounting to a fundamental breach of contract. She did not use grievance procedures, accepted the adequacy of investigations, was not threatened with dismissal, and continued to engage with the employer. Even if breaches occurred, they were waived by her conduct. There was no constructive dismissal and therefore no dismissal at all.
- Citation
- [2005] NIIT 875_03
- Parties
- Claimant: Kathleen O'Kane; Respondent: United Hospitals Trust
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Decision After Hearing Claimant's Case
- Outcome
- claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Dismissal, Unfair Dismissal, Breach of Contract, Workplace Bullying, Grievance Procedures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kathleen O'Kane
Claimant
United Hospitals Trust
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Decision After Hearing Claimant's Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was constructively dismissed
- 2 If so, whether the dismissal was unfair under Article 130 of the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order 1996
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant failed to establish any act or omission by the respondent amounting to a fundamental breach of contract. She did not use grievance procedures, accepted the adequacy of investigations, was not threatened with dismissal, and continued to engage with the employer. Even if breaches occurred, they were waived by her conduct. There was no constructive dismissal and therefore no dismissal at all.
Court Disposition
claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment