Pollock v Pollock (Breach of Contract Redundancy Payment) [2018] NIIT 06481_17IT (19 January 2018)

The claimant was entitled to notice pay and redundancy pay based on statutory calculations for redundancy and notice periods, given her age, years of service, and weekly pay.

Citation: [2018] NIIT 06481_17IT
Parties: Claimant: Sandra Pollock; Respondent: Uthit Moore
Jurisdiction: Northern Ireland
Judgment Date: 19 January 2018
Procedural Posture: Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision
Outcome: Claimant's holiday pay claim dismissed as withdrawn; claims for notice pay and redundancy pay upheld.
Legal Topics: Redundancy Payment, Notice Pay, Breach of Contract

Employment Law Redundancy Payment Notice Pay Breach of Contract

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7

Parties

Sandra Pollock

Claimant

Uthit Moore

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision

Legal Issues

1 Entitlement to notice pay
2 Entitlement to redundancy pay

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant was entitled to notice pay and redundancy pay based on statutory calculations for redundancy and notice periods, given her age, years of service, and weekly pay.

Court Disposition

Claimant's holiday pay claim dismissed as withdrawn; claims for notice pay and redundancy pay upheld.

Orders

Respondent to pay claimant £179 in respect of notice pay.
Respondent to pay claimant £267.75 as redundancy payment.