Edgar v Watson McDermott Engineering L... [2012] NIIT 01141_12IT (09 August 2012)

Edgar v Watson McDermott Engineering L... [2012] NIIT 01141_12IT (09 August 2012)

The claimant's claims for notice pay and redundancy pay are well-founded as the respondent failed to respond or participate, and the evidence supported the claims.

Citation
[2012] NIIT 01141_12IT
Parties
Claimant: Jason Edgar; Respondent: Watson McDermott Engineering Ltd
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
09 August 2012
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision After Hearing; Respondent Debarred for Failure to Respond
Outcome
Claim allowed
Legal Topics
Notice Pay, Redundancy Pay

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jason Edgar

Claimant

Watson McDermott Engineering Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision After Hearing; Respondent Debarred for Failure to Respond

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to notice pay
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to redundancy pay

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant's claims for notice pay and redundancy pay are well-founded as the respondent failed to respond or participate, and the evidence supported the claims.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed

Orders

  • Respondent to pay claimant £764 in respect of notice pay
  • Respondent to pay claimant £1,177 in respect of redundancy pay