Wylie v WDL developments Limited (In A... [2011] NIIT 00673_11IT (20 June 2011)
The claimant was not dismissed by reason of redundancy as work was available at all material times and was refused by the claimant; the dismissal was not attributable to a redundancy situation under Article 174. The claimant was entitled to two weeks' notice pay under Article 118 as he was dismissed without notice.
- Citation
- [2011] NIIT 00673_11IT
- Parties
- Claimant: Jason Wylie; Respondent: WDL Developments Limited (In Administration)
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Decision
- Outcome
- claim for redundancy payment dismissed; notice pay awarded
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy, Dismissal, Notice Pay, Gross Misconduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jason Wylie
Claimant
WDL Developments Limited (In Administration)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Was the claimant made redundant from his employment with the respondent?
- 2 If the claimant was made redundant, what is his redundancy entitlement?
- 3 If the claimant was dismissed, what amount of pay in lieu of notice is he entitled to?
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant was not dismissed by reason of redundancy as work was available at all material times and was refused by the claimant; the dismissal was not attributable to a redundancy situation under Article 174. The claimant was entitled to two weeks' notice pay under Article 118 as he was dismissed without notice.
Court Disposition
claim for redundancy payment dismissed; notice pay awarded
Orders
- The claimant’s claim for redundancy payment is dismissed.
- The claimant is awarded £560.00 in respect of notice pay.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment