Gill v Withington & Anor (Racial, Religious Political Discrimination) [2002] NIFET 544_00 (4 January 2002)

Gill v Withington & Anor (Racial, Religious Political Discrimination) [2002] NIFET 544_00 (4 January 2002)

The applicant's persistent failure to comply with tribunal orders and absence at the hearing constituted unreasonable conduct, justifying dismissal of the complaints.

Citation
[2002] NIFET 544_00
Parties
Applicant: Whyed Gill; Respondent: Ken Withington; Respondent: East Antrim Institute of Further & Higher Education
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
04 January 2002
Procedural Posture
Fair Employment Tribunal Complaint (racial, Religious, Political Discrimination) / Application to Strike Out for Non Compliance With Order for Particulars
Outcome
Complaints dismissed (struck out)
Legal Topics
Racial Discrimination, Religious Discrimination, Political Opinion Discrimination, Procedural Compliance, Striking Out Applications

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Whyed Gill

Applicant

Ken Withington

Respondent

East Antrim Institute of Further & Higher Education

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Fair Employment Tribunal Complaint (racial, Religious, Political Discrimination) / Application to Strike Out for Non Compliance With Order for Particulars

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's complaints should be struck out for failure to comply with tribunal orders and failure to prosecute the claim

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's persistent failure to comply with tribunal orders and absence at the hearing constituted unreasonable conduct, justifying dismissal of the complaints.

Court Disposition

Complaints dismissed (struck out)

Orders

  • Complaints dismissed for non-compliance with tribunal orders and failure to prosecute.