YK -v- Department for Social Development (ESA) [2012] NICom 350 (7 January 2013)

YK -v- Department for Social Development (ESA) [2012] NICom 350 (7 January 2013)

The tribunal erred in law by failing to consider whether the appellant's physical conditions could satisfy descriptors in Part 2 of Schedule 2 to the ESA Regulations (NI) 2008, as the law does not require that only mental health conditions can satisfy those descriptors.

Citation
[2012] NICom 350
Parties
Appellant: YK; Respondent: Department for Social Development
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
07 January 2013
Procedural Posture
Social Security Appeal / Appeal to Social Security Commissioner on a Question of Law From a Tribunal Decision
Outcome
decision of appeal tribunal set aside; case remitted for rehearing
Legal Topics
Employment and Support Allowance, Limited Capability for Work, Tribunal Error of Law, Application of Regulation 19 and Schedule 2 ESA Regulations (ni) 2008

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

YK

Appellant

Department for Social Development

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Social Security Appeal / Appeal to Social Security Commissioner on a Question of Law From a Tribunal Decision

  1. 1 Whether the appeal tribunal adopted the proper approach to the application of regulation 19 and Schedule 2 to the Employment and Support Allowance Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2008
  2. 2 Whether the tribunal erred in law by failing to consider Part 2 descriptors in Schedule 2 for non-mental health conditions

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal erred in law by failing to consider whether the appellant's physical conditions could satisfy descriptors in Part 2 of Schedule 2 to the ESA Regulations (NI) 2008, as the law does not require that only mental health conditions can satisfy those descriptors.

Court Disposition

decision of appeal tribunal set aside; case remitted for rehearing

Orders

  • Decision of the appeal tribunal dated 3 February 2011 is set aside.
  • Case referred to a differently constituted appeal tribunal for re-determination.