ZH v Mr and Mrs H and A Health and Social Care Trust [2016] NIFam 6 (05 September 2016)
Leave to apply for a post-adoption contact order is refused because the applicant's improved circumstances and the existence of a half-sibling do not outweigh the risk of disruption to the children's settled placement, especially given the adherence to existing contact arrangements, the early stage post-adoption, and the lack of any breach by the adopters. The application is premature and does not meet the threshold for leave under Article 10(9).
- Citation
- [2016] NIFam 6
- Parties
- Applicant: ZH; Respondents: Mr and Mrs H; Notice Party: A Health and Social Care Trust
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 05 September 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Apply for Post Adoption Contact Order / Leave to Apply for Contact Order Under Article 8 of the Children (northern Ireland) Order 1995
- Outcome
- Leave refused; application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Post Adoption Contact, Leave to Apply for Contact Order, Article 8 ECHR Rights, Sibling Contact, Parental Responsibility After Adoption
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ZH
Applicant
Mr and Mrs H
Respondents
A Health and Social Care Trust
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Apply for Post Adoption Contact Order / Leave to Apply for Contact Order Under Article 8 of the Children (northern Ireland) Order 1995
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to a birth parent to apply for a post-adoption contact order under Article 8 of the Children (Northern Ireland) Order 1995
- 2 Whether the applicant's improved circumstances and the existence of a half-sibling justify leave
- 3 Whether granting leave would risk disrupting the children's settled placement
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to apply for a post-adoption contact order is refused because the applicant's improved circumstances and the existence of a half-sibling do not outweigh the risk of disruption to the children's settled placement, especially given the adherence to existing contact arrangements, the early stage post-adoption, and the lack of any breach by the adopters. The application is premature and does not meet the threshold for leave under Article 10(9).
Court Disposition
Leave refused; application dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment