UBUSHINJACYAHA v MUTIGANDA N’ABANDI
The Court found that RNC is a terrorist group as established by prior judgments and its conduct. The accused's actions constituted full membership in a terrorist group, not mere attempt, as they had accepted and taken steps to join. Procedural objections regarding prosecution authority were dismissed as inapplicable...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- RPA 00103/2021/CA
- Parties
- Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Appellant/accused: Haragirimana Damien alias Abdallah; Appellant/accused: Mutiganda Thierry; Appellant/accused: Ndayisenga Vedaste alias Abdoullah; Appellant/accused: Nshimiye Eric
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Rwanda
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2025
- Case Number
- RPA 00103/2021/CA
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; convictions and sentences affirmed with modification to offence classification.
- Legal Topics
- Terrorism, Membership in Terrorist Organization, Procedural Law, Evidentiary Law, Sentencing
- Source Language
- rw
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ubushinjacyaha
Prosecution
Haragirimana Damien alias Abdallah
Appellant/accused
Mutiganda Thierry
Appellant/accused
Ndayisenga Vedaste alias Abdoullah
Appellant/accused
Nshimiye Eric
Appellant/accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused were properly convicted of membership in a terrorist organization (RNC)
- 2 Whether procedural objections regarding prosecution authority were valid
- 3 Whether the offences of joining an unlawful armed group and a terrorist group can be cumulated
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that RNC is a terrorist group as established by prior judgments and its conduct. The accused's actions constituted full membership in a terrorist group, not mere attempt, as they had accepted and taken steps to join. Procedural objections regarding prosecution authority were dismissed as inapplicable to terrorist group charges. The evidence, including investigative confessions and corroborating statements, was sufficient. The offences of joining an unlawful armed group and a terrorist group cannot be cumulated; only the terrorist group offence stands. The sentence of 15 years' imprisonment is appropriate and not subject to further reduction or suspension.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; convictions and sentences affirmed with modification to offence classification.
Orders
- Convictions for joining an unlawful armed group and incitement quashed; all appellants convicted solely of membership in a terrorist group (RNC).
- Each appellant to serve 15 years' imprisonment as previously imposed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment