ABAZUNGURA BA KABURAME Samson Re

ABAZUNGURA BA KABURAME Samson Re

The court held that the appellate judgment was clear: only the portion of land actually claimed and litigated by the respondents was awarded to them, not the entire parcel registered under UPI 5/04/01/04/1205. The application for clarification was therefore baseless.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RS/INTERT/ RC 00001/2021/CA
Parties
Applicant: Abazungura ba Kaburame Samson; Respondent: Abazungura ba Reberaho Janvier
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
30 September 2021
Case Number
RS/INTERT/ RC 00001/2021/CA
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Clarification of Appellate Judgment
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Land Disputes, Judgment Clarification, Inheritance, Land Registration
Civil Procedure Property Law Land Disputes Judgment Clarification Inheritance Land Registration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Abazungura ba Kaburame Samson

Applicant

Abazungura ba Reberaho Janvier

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Application for Clarification of Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the appellate court awarded the entire land registered under UPI 5/04/01/04/1205 to the respondents, including portions not litigated or claimed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the appellate judgment was clear: only the portion of land actually claimed and litigated by the respondents was awarded to them, not the entire parcel registered under UPI 5/04/01/04/1205. The application for clarification was therefore baseless.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for clarification is dismissed as baseless.
  • No ambiguity exists in the appellate judgment.