AIRTEL RWANDA LTD v. RWANDA REVENUE AUTHORITY

AIRTEL RWANDA LTD v. RWANDA REVENUE AUTHORITY

A 100% change in shareholding and voting rights in a company whose shares are not traded on a recognized stock exchange constitutes a substantive change under Article 29(3) of Law No 16/2005, precluding the carry-forward of losses. The company continued to exist and was not deregistered, so the exception for full...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOMA 00137/2018/CHC/HCC
Parties
Appellant: AIRTEL RWANDA LTD; Respondent: RWANDA REVENUE AUTHORITY
Court
Commercial High Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
9 November 2018
Case Number
RCOMA 00137/2018/CHC/HCC
Procedural Posture
Commercial Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Corporate Loss Carry Forward, Shareholding Change and Tax Consequences, Corporate Restructuring, Tax Appeals
Source Language
rw
Tax Law Commercial Law Corporate Loss Carry Forward Shareholding Change and Tax Consequences Corporate Restructuring Tax Appeals

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

AIRTEL RWANDA LTD

Appellant

RWANDA REVENUE AUTHORITY

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether a 100% change in shareholding constitutes a change for purposes of loss carry-forward under Article 29(3) of Law No 16/2005
  2. 2 Whether loss carry-forward is permitted where shares are not traded on a recognized stock exchange
  3. 3 Whether there was a change in the shareholder or merely a correction of records

Ratio Decidendi

A 100% change in shareholding and voting rights in a company whose shares are not traded on a recognized stock exchange constitutes a substantive change under Article 29(3) of Law No 16/2005, precluding the carry-forward of losses. The company continued to exist and was not deregistered, so the exception for full acquisition and deregistration does not apply. The existence of a recognized stock exchange is not limited to Rwanda, and the law applies as long as a recognized exchange exists anywhere. The appellant's arguments regarding mere correction of records and lack of substantive change are rejected.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • AIRTEL RWANDA LTD to pay RRA 1,000,000 FRW as costs of the appeal
  • Filing fees paid by AIRTEL RWANDA LTD to remain with the State