UBUSHINJACYAHA v. SULULU MARUGIRA N’UNDI

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. SULULU MARUGIRA N’UNDI

The tools carried by the accused (scie à métaux and fer à béton) qualify as weapons under the relevant criminal statutes, making the offense aggravated robbery. However, considering their first-time offender status, remorse, lack of significant harm, and their young age, the sentence should be reduced to eight years' imprisonment and a fine of five million Rwandan francs each.

Citation
RPAA 00248/2021/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Appellant/accused: Michael Sululu Marugira; Appellant/accused: Abel Sululu Vigi
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
28 March 2025
Case Number
RPAA 00248/2021/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal partially allowed; conviction for aggravated robbery upheld; sentence reduced.
Legal Topics
Armed Robbery, Sentencing, Mitigating Circumstances, Interpretation of 'weapon' in Robbery, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
rw

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Michael Sululu Marugira

Appellant/accused

Abel Sululu Vigi

Appellant/accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the tools used by the accused constitute 'weapons' under the law for the purposes of aggravated robbery
  2. 2 Whether the sentence imposed should be reduced due to mitigating circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

The tools carried by the accused (scie à métaux and fer à béton) qualify as weapons under the relevant criminal statutes, making the offense aggravated robbery. However, considering their first-time offender status, remorse, lack of significant harm, and their young age, the sentence should be reduced to eight years' imprisonment and a fine of five million Rwandan francs each.

Court Disposition

Appeal partially allowed; conviction for aggravated robbery upheld; sentence reduced.

Orders

  • Conviction for aggravated robbery affirmed.
  • Sentence reduced to eight years' imprisonment and a fine of five million Rwandan francs for each accused.