Re ASHINZWUWERA

Re ASHINZWUWERA

The removal of Ashinzwuwera Alexandre Dumas from Parliament complied with the legal procedure as he was heard by the Committee, the Chamber acted on the Committee's report with the required majority, and disciplinary action is not precluded by pending or acquitted criminal cases. The applicant failed to rebut the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RS/SPEC0001/11/CS
Parties
Applicant: Ashinzwuwera Alexandre Dumas; Respondent: Chamber of Deputies (Umutwe w’Abadepite)
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
26 August 2011
Case Number
RS/SPEC0001/11/CS
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Administrative Law / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Removal of Member of Parliament, Due Process in Disciplinary Proceedings, Separation of Disciplinary and Criminal Proceedings
Source Language
rw
Constitutional Law Administrative Law Parliamentary Law Removal of Member of Parliament Due Process in Disciplinary Proceedings Separation of Disciplinary and Criminal Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ashinzwuwera Alexandre Dumas

Applicant

Chamber of Deputies (Umutwe w’Abadepite)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Administrative Law / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the procedure for removal of Ashinzwuwera Alexandre Dumas from Parliament was lawful
  2. 2 Whether pending or concluded criminal proceedings preclude disciplinary action by Parliament
  3. 3 Whether the grounds for removal had legal basis

Ratio Decidendi

The removal of Ashinzwuwera Alexandre Dumas from Parliament complied with the legal procedure as he was heard by the Committee, the Chamber acted on the Committee's report with the required majority, and disciplinary action is not precluded by pending or acquitted criminal cases. The applicant failed to rebut the Committee's findings or provide contrary evidence.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • Applicant to pay court costs of 9700 FRW