ARPEQ v. SEGATABAZI

ARPEQ v. SEGATABAZI

The Supreme Court found that ARPEQ had admitted the debt of 48,693,694 Frw, justifying the High Court's order for provisional execution on that amount. The Court held that provisional execution can be ordered on part of a debt and that ARPEQ's arguments did not meet the legal grounds for staying execution....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RLR V.4 - 2015
Parties
Applicant: Association pour la Promotion de l’Education de Qualité (ARPEQ); Respondent: Segatabazi Protais
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
10 January 2014
Case Number
RC 0004/13/CS
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Stay of Provisional Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Provisional Execution, Stay of Execution, Enforcement of Judgments
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Provisional Execution Stay of Execution Enforcement of Judgments

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Association pour la Promotion de l’Education de Qualité (ARPEQ)

Applicant

Segatabazi Protais

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Application for Stay of Provisional Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the High Court's order for provisional execution was unlawful or contrary to law
  2. 2 Whether ARPEQ's reasons justify a stay of provisional execution

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court found that ARPEQ had admitted the debt of 48,693,694 Frw, justifying the High Court's order for provisional execution on that amount. The Court held that provisional execution can be ordered on part of a debt and that ARPEQ's arguments did not meet the legal grounds for staying execution. Therefore, the application had no merit.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • ARPEQ to pay court costs of 11,400 Frw