BAHO INTERNATIONAL HOSPITAL Ltd v. BUSHISHI

BAHO INTERNATIONAL HOSPITAL Ltd v. BUSHISHI

Baho International Hospital Ltd failed to demonstrate any concrete evidence of urgency or irreparable harm that would result from immediate execution of the judgment. Mere assertions that Bushishi could not refund the money were unsupported. The law requires more than speculative risk; the applicant must show...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RSA/SCP/RSOC 00001/2025/CA
Parties
Appellant: BAHO INTERNATIONAL HOSPITAL Ltd; Respondent: BUSHISHI Blaise Pascal
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
27 November 2025
Case Number
RSA/SCP/RSOC 00001/2025/CA
Procedural Posture
Labour Appeal (urgent Application) / Court of Appeal Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; High Court decision affirmed.
Legal Topics
Urgent Applications, Provisional Execution, Labour Contract Termination, Appeals Process
Source Language
rw
Labour Law Civil Procedure Urgent Applications Provisional Execution Labour Contract Termination Appeals Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

BAHO INTERNATIONAL HOSPITAL Ltd

Appellant

BUSHISHI Blaise Pascal

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Labour Appeal (urgent Application) / Court of Appeal Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Baho International Hospital Ltd demonstrated sufficient urgency to warrant suspension of provisional execution pending revision proceedings
  2. 2 Whether the lower courts erred in refusing to suspend execution of the judgment awarding damages to Bushishi

Ratio Decidendi

Baho International Hospital Ltd failed to demonstrate any concrete evidence of urgency or irreparable harm that would result from immediate execution of the judgment. Mere assertions that Bushishi could not refund the money were unsupported. The law requires more than speculative risk; the applicant must show specific, substantiated facts. The High Court correctly dismissed the urgent application, and the appeal is without merit.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; High Court decision affirmed.

Orders

  • The appeal by Baho International Hospital Ltd is dismissed as unfounded.
  • The High Court ruling in RSOC00002/2025/HC/KIG dated 14/05/2025 remains unchanged.