Re BAKOMEZA NA UWIRAGIYE

The claim was inadmissible under the summary written procedure because there were factual disputes regarding the land, and the applicants failed to properly name and summon the correct respondent (the national land management authority).

Citation: RADA 00004/2022/HC/RWG
Parties: Applicant: Bakomeza Joseph; Applicant: Uwiragiye Florence; Respondent: Akarere ka Kayonza; Interested Party: Ikigo cy’igihugu gishinzwe imicungire n’imikoreshereze y’ubutaka mu Rwanda (RLMUA)
Court: High Court
Jurisdiction: Rwanda
Judgment Date: 13 January 2023
Case Number: RADA 00004/2022/HC/RWG
Procedural Posture: Administrative Appeal / High Court Appellate Review
Outcome: appeal dismissed
Legal Topics: Challenge to Administrative Decision, Land Rights, Procedural Admissibility
Source Language: rw, en

Administrative Law Land Law Challenge to Administrative Decision Land Rights Procedural Admissibility

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Bakomeza Joseph

Applicant

Uwiragiye Florence

Applicant

Akarere ka Kayonza

Respondent

Ikigo cy’igihugu gishinzwe imicungire n’imikoreshereze y’ubutaka mu Rwanda (RLMUA)

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Administrative Appeal / High Court Appellate Review

Legal Issues

1 Whether the applicants' claim challenging the administrative decision on land rights was admissible under the summary written procedure for administrative cases
2 Whether the proper respondent was named in the original claim

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

The judgment of the Intermediate Court of Ngoma (RAD 00010/2021/TGI/NGOMA) is upheld in all respects.
The claim is declared inadmissible.