UBUSHINJACYAHA v BANGARYIMANA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v BANGARYIMANA

The appellate court held that the combination of the large quantity of marijuana, its packaging, the defendant's own admissions, and consistent witness testimony were sufficient to prove drug trafficking beyond reasonable doubt, even in the absence of direct evidence of a sale or transaction. The defendant failed to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 01370/2024/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Bangaryimana Dieudonné
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
19 September 2025
Case Number
RPAA 01370/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed.
Legal Topics
Drug Trafficking, Evidentiary Standards, Appeals
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Drug Trafficking Evidentiary Standards Appeals

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Bangaryimana Dieudonné

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Bangaryimana Dieudonné was properly convicted of drug trafficking in absence of direct evidence of sale or transaction
  2. 2 Whether the evidence relied upon was sufficient to establish the offence of drug trafficking

Ratio Decidendi

The appellate court held that the combination of the large quantity of marijuana, its packaging, the defendant's own admissions, and consistent witness testimony were sufficient to prove drug trafficking beyond reasonable doubt, even in the absence of direct evidence of a sale or transaction. The defendant failed to rebut or undermine this evidence.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed.

Orders

  • The appeal of Bangaryimana Dieudonné is dismissed as unfounded.
  • The judgment of the High Court (RPA 00991/2022/HC/KIG) dated 20/11/2024 is upheld.