UBUSHINJACYAHA v. BARANYERETSE

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. BARANYERETSE

Admitting guilt for the first time at the appellate stage does not qualify as a mitigating circumstance under Article 59 of Law Nº 68/2018. The conviction and sentence for trafficking and transporting cannabis are upheld due to the large quantity involved and lack of valid grounds for appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 00498/2022/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Baranyeretse Théoneste
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
12 December 2024
Case Number
RPAA 00498/2022/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Drug Trafficking, Sentencing, Mitigating Circumstances, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Drug Trafficking Sentencing Mitigating Circumstances Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Baranyeretse Théoneste

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Baranyeretse Théoneste should receive a reduced sentence for admitting guilt for the first time at the appellate stage
  2. 2 Whether the conviction and sentence for drug trafficking and transportation were appropriate

Ratio Decidendi

Admitting guilt for the first time at the appellate stage does not qualify as a mitigating circumstance under Article 59 of Law Nº 68/2018. The conviction and sentence for trafficking and transporting cannabis are upheld due to the large quantity involved and lack of valid grounds for appeal.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal of Baranyeretse Théoneste is dismissed as unfounded.
  • The conviction and sentence of 25 years imprisonment and a fine of 20,100,000 Frw are upheld.