BEN BENZINGE v. NRD Ltd
The Supreme Court has jurisdiction to hear urgent applications if the substantive matter is before it, but an urgent application cannot be admitted if the applicant has not filed a substantive claim in the Supreme Court. Since BEN BENZINGE had not filed a substantive claim, his urgent application was inadmissible.
- Citation
- RCOM 0011/13/CS
- Parties
- Applicant: BEN BENZINGE; Respondent: Natural Resources Development Rwanda Ltd (NRD Ltd)
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Rwanda
- Judgment Date
- 10 January 2014
- Case Number
- RCOM 0011/13/CS
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Appeal / Supreme Court Ruling on Urgent Application
- Outcome
- Urgent application dismissed as inadmissible; costs awarded against applicant.
- Legal Topics
- Urgent Applications, Jurisdiction of Supreme Court, Procedural Admissibility
- Source Language
- rw, en
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BEN BENZINGE
Applicant
Natural Resources Development Rwanda Ltd (NRD Ltd)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Commercial Appeal / Supreme Court Ruling on Urgent Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to hear urgent applications in commercial matters
- 2 Whether an urgent application can be admitted when the applicant has not filed a substantive claim in the Supreme Court
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court has jurisdiction to hear urgent applications if the substantive matter is before it, but an urgent application cannot be admitted if the applicant has not filed a substantive claim in the Supreme Court. Since BEN BENZINGE had not filed a substantive claim, his urgent application was inadmissible.
Court Disposition
Urgent application dismissed as inadmissible; costs awarded against applicant.
Orders
- The urgent application filed by BEN BENZINGE is not admitted.
- BEN BENZINGE is ordered to pay court costs of 12,100 Rwandan Francs, recoverable by force if not paid.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment