BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS Ltd vs IKIGO CY’IMISORO N’AMAHORO (RRA)

BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS Ltd vs IKIGO CY’IMISORO N’AMAHORO (RRA)

The documents submitted by Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd were not new evidence within the meaning of the law, as they were in the applicant’s possession or accessible at the time of the original proceedings. The applicant failed to demonstrate that it could not have obtained or presented them earlier. Therefore, the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RS/REV/RCOM 00002/2022/CA
Parties
Applicant: Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd; Respondent: Ikigo cy’Imisoro n’Amafaranga (Rwanda Revenue Authority)
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
29 November 2024
Case Number
RS/REV/RCOM 00002/2022/CA
Procedural Posture
Commercial Revision / Application for Review on Grounds of New Evidence
Outcome
Application for review dismissed as inadmissible.
Legal Topics
Review of Judgment, New Evidence, Corporate Taxation, Withholding Tax, VAT, Costs and Attorney Fees
Source Language
rw
Tax Law Civil Procedure Commercial Law Review of Judgment New Evidence Corporate Taxation Withholding Tax VAT +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd

Applicant

Ikigo cy’Imisoro n’Amafaranga (Rwanda Revenue Authority)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial Revision / Application for Review on Grounds of New Evidence

  1. 1 Whether the documents submitted by Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd constitute new evidence justifying review of the prior judgment RCOMAA00023/2021/CA
  2. 2 Whether Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd is liable for costs and attorney fees to Rwanda Revenue Authority

Ratio Decidendi

The documents submitted by Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd were not new evidence within the meaning of the law, as they were in the applicant’s possession or accessible at the time of the original proceedings. The applicant failed to demonstrate that it could not have obtained or presented them earlier. Therefore, the application for review is inadmissible.

Court Disposition

Application for review dismissed as inadmissible.

Orders

  • Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd to pay Rwanda Revenue Authority 200,000 Frw as costs and 500,000 Frw as attorney fees.
  • The security deposit paid by Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd is deemed to cover the costs incurred.