BIENVENU v. UBUSHINJACYAHA

BIENVENU v. UBUSHINJACYAHA

The applicant's alleged new evidence (trial transcript) is not new, as he was present and signed it at trial. The grounds do not meet the statutory requirements for review. The application is inadmissible.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RS/REV/RP 00067/2024/CA
Parties
Applicant: Bienvenu Omar; Respondent: Ubushinjacyaha
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
23 December 2025
Case Number
RS/REV/RP 00067/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Court of Appeal Application for Review Based on New Evidence
Outcome
application dismissed as inadmissible
Legal Topics
Sexual Offences, Review of Judgments, New Evidence, Ultra Petita, Sentencing
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Sexual Offences Review of Judgments New Evidence Ultra Petita Sentencing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bienvenu Omar

Applicant

Ubushinjacyaha

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Court of Appeal Application for Review Based on New Evidence

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's claim constitutes new evidence justifying review of the judgment
  2. 2 Whether the Court exceeded the requests of the parties (ultra petita) in sentencing
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to a reduction of sentence based on new legislation

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's alleged new evidence (trial transcript) is not new, as he was present and signed it at trial. The grounds do not meet the statutory requirements for review. The application is inadmissible.

Court Disposition

application dismissed as inadmissible

Orders

  • The application for review is not admitted.
  • Bienvenu Omar is exempted from court fees due to being incarcerated.