Download PDF

Rwanda Civil

High Court

Re BITONDERUBUSA

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Court found that the judgment contained apparent errors in the identification of the court and the district of residence, and rectified these errors in accordance with article 154 of Law no 21/2012.

Court disposition

application allowed; judgment rectified

Orders

  • The judgment RCA 0238/14/TGI/NYGE which was appealed was rendered by the Intermediate Court of Gasabo instead of the Intermediate Court of Nyarugenge.
  • Paragraph 8 in the decision refers to the judgment RCA 0238/14/TGI/NYGE rendered by the Intermediate Court of Gasabo on 30 October 2014 instead of the Intermediate Court of Nyarugenge.
  • Bitonderubusa Jean Baptiste resides in Burera district, north province, instead of Busera, west province.
  • This judgment completes and rectifies the judgment RCAA 0099/14/HC/KIG rendered by the High Court on 15 May 2015.

02

Material facts

Parties

Bitonderubusa Jean Baptiste

Applicant

Nambaje Francois

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil / Application for Rectification of Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the judgment contained apparent errors requiring rectification under article 154 of Law no 21/2012

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant argued that the appealed judgment contained spelling mistakes regarding the district where the judgment was heard and the district of origin for the respondent, specifically using Nyarugenge instead of Gasabo and Bugesera instead of Burera.
Respondent
No adversarial arguments were presented as the application was decided in camera.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Law no 21/2012 of 14/06/2012, article 154

    Applications seeking to rectify an apparent error on the record shall be decided in camera without adversarial arguments and without alteration regarding the winning party.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Court found that the judgment contained apparent errors in the identification of the court and the district of residence, and rectified these errors in accordance with article 154 of Law no 21/2012.

Court disposition

application allowed; judgment rectified

  • The judgment RCA 0238/14/TGI/NYGE which was appealed was rendered by the Intermediate Court of Gasabo instead of the Intermediate Court of Nyarugenge.
  • Paragraph 8 in the decision refers to the judgment RCA 0238/14/TGI/NYGE rendered by the Intermediate Court of Gasabo on 30 October 2014 instead of the Intermediate Court of Nyarugenge.
  • Bitonderubusa Jean Baptiste resides in Burera district, north province, instead of Busera, west province.
  • This judgment completes and rectifies the judgment RCAA 0099/14/HC/KIG rendered by the High Court on 15 May 2015.

Source and reliance status

High Court · 18 June 2015

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

High Court

Civil· 18 June 2015

RCAA0036/15/HC/KIG

Re BITONDERUBUSA

- Source: Amategeko - Section: Decisions (Judgements) - Date: 2015-06-18 - Case/document no.: RCAA0036/15/HC/KIG - Collection: High Court

Text

Page 1

Re BITONDERUBUSA [Rwanda HIGH COURT – RCAA0036/15/HC/KIG (Nzabonimana, P.J.) June 18, 2015] Civil procedure – Application seeking to rectify a judgment – Applications seeking to rectify an apparent error on the record shall be decided in camera without adversarial arguments and without alteration regarding the winning party – Law no 21/2012 of 14/06/2012 relating to the civil, commercial, labour and administrative procedure, article 154. Facts : Bitonderubusa filed a claim requesting to rectify the spelling mistakes which appeared in the appealed judgment in which Nambaje sued him. He continues in explaining that there was an error on the district which the appealed judgment was heard in because they use Nyarugenge instead of Gasabo and also there was an error on district of the origin for the respondent because they wrote Bugesera instead of Burera. Held : Applications seeking to rectify an apparent error on the record shall be decided in camera without adversarial arguments and without alteration regarding the winning party, therefore the judgment is rectified as follow: - The judgment RCA 0238/14/TGI/NYGE which was appealed and rendered by the Intermediate Court of Gasabo instead of being Intermediate Court of Nyarugenge - The paragraph 8 in the decision of the Court, the mentioned rulings is for the judgment RCA 0238/14/TGI/NYGE rendered by the Intermediate Court of Gasabo

on 30 October 2014 instead of intermediate Court of Nyarugenge - Bitonderubusa Jean Baptiste resides in Burera district, north province, instead of being Busera, west province. Application has merit. Statutes and statutory instruments referred to: Law no 21/2012 of 14/06/2012 relating to the civil, commercial, labour and administrative procedure, article 154. No cases referred to. Judgment I. BRIEF BACKGROUND OF THE CASE

[1] BITONDERUBUSA Jean Baptiste filed a claim in this Court which was recorded on RCAA0036/15/HC/KIG states that the judgment RCAA 0099/14/HC/KIG which NAMBAJE

Page 2

Francois appealed at the High Court whereby he sued him it appeared the spelling mistakes which he requests the Court to rectify.

[2] He states that there was an error on the district which the appealed judgment was heard in because they use Nyarugenge instead of Gasabo. He states that there was an error on district of the origin for the respondent because they wrote Bugesera instead of Burera. II. VIEW OF THE COURT

[3] The Court bases on article 154 of the law no 21/2012 of 14/06/2012 relating to the civil, commercial, labour and administrative procedure, the judgment RCAA 0099/14/HC/KIG rendered by the High Court on 15 May 2015 is rectifies as follow:

- The judgment RCA 0238/14/TGI/NYGE which was appealed and rendered by the Intermediate Court of Gasabo instead of being rendered by the intermediate Court of Nyarugenge therefore in its paragraph 8in the decision of the Court, the mentioned rulings is for the judgment RCA 0238/14/TGI/NYGE rendered by the Intermediate Court of Gasabo on 30 October 2014 instead of intermediate Court of Nyarugenge.

- Concerning the origin district of the respondent, the Court bases on the file of submitting a claim in this court it finds that Bitonderubusa Jean Baptiste resides in Burera district, north province, instead of being Busera, west province. III. DECISION OF THE COURT

[4] It decides that Applications seeking to rectify the judgment RCAA 0099/14/HC/KIG rendered by the High Court on 15 May 2015 submitted by Bitonderabusa Jean baptiste has merit; [5] It holds that the judgment is rectified as follow: - The judgment RCA 0238/14/TGI/NYGE which was appealed and rendered by the Intermediate Court of Gasabo instead of being Intermediate Court of Nyarugenge - The paragraph 8 in the decision of the Court, the mentioned rulings is for the judgment RCA 0238/14/TGI/NYGE rendered by the Intermediate Court of Gasabo on 30 October 2014 instead of intermediate Court of Nyarugenge - Bitonderubusa Jean Baptiste resides in Burera district, north province, instead of being Busera, west province.

[6] It orders that this judgment to complete the judgment RCAA 0099/14/HC/KIG rendered by the High Court on 15 may 2015 rectified.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Law no 21/2012 of 14/06/2012 relating to the civil, commercial, labour and administrative procedure, article 154

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.