Re BITONDERUBUSA
- Citation
- RCAA0036/15/HC/KIG
- Status
- Civil
- Jurisdiction
- Rwanda
- Court
- High Court
- Decision
- 18 June 2015
- Posture
- Civil / Application for Rectification of Judgment
- Case number
- RCAA0036/15/HC/KIG
More details
- Court
- High Court
- Decision
- 18 June 2015
- Posture
- Civil / Application for Rectification of Judgment
- Case number
- RCAA0036/15/HC/KIG
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Court found that the judgment contained apparent errors in the identification of the court and the district of residence, and rectified these errors in accordance with article 154 of Law no 21/2012.
Court disposition
application allowed; judgment rectified
Orders
- The judgment RCA 0238/14/TGI/NYGE which was appealed was rendered by the Intermediate Court of Gasabo instead of the Intermediate Court of Nyarugenge.
- Paragraph 8 in the decision refers to the judgment RCA 0238/14/TGI/NYGE rendered by the Intermediate Court of Gasabo on 30 October 2014 instead of the Intermediate Court of Nyarugenge.
- Bitonderubusa Jean Baptiste resides in Burera district, north province, instead of Busera, west province.
- This judgment completes and rectifies the judgment RCAA 0099/14/HC/KIG rendered by the High Court on 15 May 2015.
02
Material facts
Parties
Bitonderubusa Jean Baptiste
ApplicantNambaje Francois
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Civil / Application for Rectification of Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the judgment contained apparent errors requiring rectification under article 154 of Law no 21/2012
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant argued that the appealed judgment contained spelling mistakes regarding the district where the judgment was heard and the district of origin for the respondent, specifically using Nyarugenge instead of Gasabo and Bugesera instead of Burera.
- Respondent
- No adversarial arguments were presented as the application was decided in camera.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Law no 21/2012 of 14/06/2012, article 154
Applications seeking to rectify an apparent error on the record shall be decided in camera without adversarial arguments and without alteration regarding the winning party.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Court found that the judgment contained apparent errors in the identification of the court and the district of residence, and rectified these errors in accordance with article 154 of Law no 21/2012.
Court disposition
application allowed; judgment rectified
- The judgment RCA 0238/14/TGI/NYGE which was appealed was rendered by the Intermediate Court of Gasabo instead of the Intermediate Court of Nyarugenge.
- Paragraph 8 in the decision refers to the judgment RCA 0238/14/TGI/NYGE rendered by the Intermediate Court of Gasabo on 30 October 2014 instead of the Intermediate Court of Nyarugenge.
- Bitonderubusa Jean Baptiste resides in Burera district, north province, instead of Busera, west province.
- This judgment completes and rectifies the judgment RCAA 0099/14/HC/KIG rendered by the High Court on 15 May 2015.
Source and reliance status
High Court · 18 June 2015
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
High Court
Civil· 18 June 2015
Re BITONDERUBUSA
- Source: Amategeko - Section: Decisions (Judgements) - Date: 2015-06-18 - Case/document no.: RCAA0036/15/HC/KIG - Collection: High Court
Text
Page 1
Re BITONDERUBUSA [Rwanda HIGH COURT – RCAA0036/15/HC/KIG (Nzabonimana, P.J.) June 18, 2015] Civil procedure – Application seeking to rectify a judgment – Applications seeking to rectify an apparent error on the record shall be decided in camera without adversarial arguments and without alteration regarding the winning party – Law no 21/2012 of 14/06/2012 relating to the civil, commercial, labour and administrative procedure, article 154. Facts : Bitonderubusa filed a claim requesting to rectify the spelling mistakes which appeared in the appealed judgment in which Nambaje sued him. He continues in explaining that there was an error on the district which the appealed judgment was heard in because they use Nyarugenge instead of Gasabo and also there was an error on district of the origin for the respondent because they wrote Bugesera instead of Burera. Held : Applications seeking to rectify an apparent error on the record shall be decided in camera without adversarial arguments and without alteration regarding the winning party, therefore the judgment is rectified as follow: - The judgment RCA 0238/14/TGI/NYGE which was appealed and rendered by the Intermediate Court of Gasabo instead of being Intermediate Court of Nyarugenge - The paragraph 8 in the decision of the Court, the mentioned rulings is for the judgment RCA 0238/14/TGI/NYGE rendered by the Intermediate Court of Gasabo
on 30 October 2014 instead of intermediate Court of Nyarugenge - Bitonderubusa Jean Baptiste resides in Burera district, north province, instead of being Busera, west province. Application has merit. Statutes and statutory instruments referred to: Law no 21/2012 of 14/06/2012 relating to the civil, commercial, labour and administrative procedure, article 154. No cases referred to. Judgment I. BRIEF BACKGROUND OF THE CASE
[1] BITONDERUBUSA Jean Baptiste filed a claim in this Court which was recorded on RCAA0036/15/HC/KIG states that the judgment RCAA 0099/14/HC/KIG which NAMBAJE
Page 2
Francois appealed at the High Court whereby he sued him it appeared the spelling mistakes which he requests the Court to rectify.
[2] He states that there was an error on the district which the appealed judgment was heard in because they use Nyarugenge instead of Gasabo. He states that there was an error on district of the origin for the respondent because they wrote Bugesera instead of Burera. II. VIEW OF THE COURT
[3] The Court bases on article 154 of the law no 21/2012 of 14/06/2012 relating to the civil, commercial, labour and administrative procedure, the judgment RCAA 0099/14/HC/KIG rendered by the High Court on 15 May 2015 is rectifies as follow:
- The judgment RCA 0238/14/TGI/NYGE which was appealed and rendered by the Intermediate Court of Gasabo instead of being rendered by the intermediate Court of Nyarugenge therefore in its paragraph 8in the decision of the Court, the mentioned rulings is for the judgment RCA 0238/14/TGI/NYGE rendered by the Intermediate Court of Gasabo on 30 October 2014 instead of intermediate Court of Nyarugenge.
- Concerning the origin district of the respondent, the Court bases on the file of submitting a claim in this court it finds that Bitonderubusa Jean Baptiste resides in Burera district, north province, instead of being Busera, west province. III. DECISION OF THE COURT
[4] It decides that Applications seeking to rectify the judgment RCAA 0099/14/HC/KIG rendered by the High Court on 15 May 2015 submitted by Bitonderabusa Jean baptiste has merit; [5] It holds that the judgment is rectified as follow: - The judgment RCA 0238/14/TGI/NYGE which was appealed and rendered by the Intermediate Court of Gasabo instead of being Intermediate Court of Nyarugenge - The paragraph 8 in the decision of the Court, the mentioned rulings is for the judgment RCA 0238/14/TGI/NYGE rendered by the Intermediate Court of Gasabo on 30 October 2014 instead of intermediate Court of Nyarugenge - Bitonderubusa Jean Baptiste resides in Burera district, north province, instead of being Busera, west province.
[6] It orders that this judgment to complete the judgment RCAA 0099/14/HC/KIG rendered by the High Court on 15 may 2015 rectified.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.