UBUSHINJACYAHA v BIZIMUNGU

UBUSHINJACYAHA v BIZIMUNGU

Bizimungu Kanyamibare's admission of guilt and request for forgiveness do not warrant sentence reduction due to the extreme cruelty and premeditation of the murder; court is not obliged to reduce sentence even if mitigating circumstances exist.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 00872/2024/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Bizimungu Kanyamibare
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
20 October 2025
Case Number
RPAA 00872/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Murder, Sentencing, Mitigating Circumstances, Appeal
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Murder Sentencing Mitigating Circumstances Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Bizimungu Kanyamibare

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Bizimungu Kanyamibare should have his sentence reduced due to admission of guilt and request for forgiveness

Ratio Decidendi

Bizimungu Kanyamibare's admission of guilt and request for forgiveness do not warrant sentence reduction due to the extreme cruelty and premeditation of the murder; court is not obliged to reduce sentence even if mitigating circumstances exist.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Judgment of High Court (RPA 00196/2022/HC/KIG) affirmed; life imprisonment sentence upheld