BRITAM INSURANCE COMPANY LTD LTD v MAGASIN SOLUTION ET MATERIELS DE BUREAU LTD N’UNDI

BRITAM INSURANCE COMPANY LTD LTD v MAGASIN SOLUTION ET MATERIELS DE BUREAU LTD N’UNDI

BRITAM, having inspected the property and contracted for insurance, cannot deny indemnity based on the use of the property as a factory, as there was no post-contractual change in risk and no misrepresentation by the insured. The insurance contract was valid and enforceable, and BRITAM is liable for the agreed...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOMA 00616/2019/HCC
Parties
Appellant: BRITAM INSURANCE COMPANY LTD; Respondent: MAGASIN SOLUTION ET MATERIELS DE BUREAU LTD; Intervener: EQUITY BANK RWANDA LTD
Court
Commercial High Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
16 June 2022
Case Number
RCOMA 00616/2019/HCC
Procedural Posture
Commercial Insurance Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Fire Insurance, Duty of Disclosure, Misrepresentation, Contractual Indemnity, Burden of Proof, Bank as Insured Party
Insurance Law Contract Law Commercial Law Fire Insurance Duty of Disclosure Misrepresentation Contractual Indemnity Burden of Proof +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

BRITAM INSURANCE COMPANY LTD

Appellant

MAGASIN SOLUTION ET MATERIELS DE BUREAU LTD

Respondent

EQUITY BANK RWANDA LTD

Intervener

Procedural Posture

Commercial Insurance Appeal / Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the insurer can deny indemnity based on alleged misrepresentation regarding the use of the insured property
  2. 2 Whether the insured or the bank failed in their duty of disclosure
  3. 3 Whether there was fraud or misrepresentation in the insurance contract formation

Ratio Decidendi

BRITAM, having inspected the property and contracted for insurance, cannot deny indemnity based on the use of the property as a factory, as there was no post-contractual change in risk and no misrepresentation by the insured. The insurance contract was valid and enforceable, and BRITAM is liable for the agreed indemnity and legal costs.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • BRITAM to pay MAGASIN SOLUTION ET MATERIELS DE BUREAU LTD 500,000 RWF as legal costs for the appeal
  • MAGASIN SOLUTION ET MATERIELS DE BUREAU LTD to pay EQUITY BANK RWANDA LTD 500,000 RWF as legal costs for the appeal