UBUSHINJACYAHA v BUCYENSENGE

UBUSHINJACYAHA v BUCYENSENGE

The paternity judgment from the Byumba Primary Court is not a new fact within the meaning of Article 197(5) of Law No. 027/2019, as it does not contradict the evidence supporting the conviction for defilement, and the applicant failed to show he could not have accessed such evidence during the original proceedings.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RS/REV/RP 00072/2024/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Bucyensenge Jean Baptiste
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
17 July 2025
Case Number
RS/REV/RP 00072/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Application for Review Based on New Evidence
Outcome
Application for review dismissed as inadmissible.
Legal Topics
Review of Criminal Judgments, New Evidence, Sexual Offences Against Minors
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Review of Criminal Judgments New Evidence Sexual Offences Against Minors

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Bucyensenge Jean Baptiste

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Application for Review Based on New Evidence

  1. 1 Whether the judgment in RPAA 00520/2018/CA should be reviewed based on new evidence (a civil judgment denying paternity)

Ratio Decidendi

The paternity judgment from the Byumba Primary Court is not a new fact within the meaning of Article 197(5) of Law No. 027/2019, as it does not contradict the evidence supporting the conviction for defilement, and the applicant failed to show he could not have accessed such evidence during the original proceedings.

Court Disposition

Application for review dismissed as inadmissible.

Orders

  • The application for review of RPAA 00520/2018/CA is not admitted.
  • Bucyensenge Jean Baptiste is exempted from paying court costs due to being in detention.