Re BUCYESENGE MENDE

Re BUCYESENGE MENDE

Paragraph 4 of Article 161 of Law No 22/2018 does not violate Articles 15, 29(1)(c), or 34 of the Constitution. The limitation on third-party opposition to judgments of the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court is justified by the need for finality in litigation, applies equally to all, and does not deprive individuals...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RLR V.4-2025
Parties
Applicant: Bucyensenge Mende Claude; Respondent: Republic of Rwanda
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
25 April 2025
Case Number
RS/INCONST/SPEC00006/2023/SC
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Final Judgment
Outcome
petition dismissed
Legal Topics
Equality Before the Law, Access to Justice, Property Rights, Finality of Judgments, Extraordinary Remedies
Source Language
rw
Constitutional Law Civil Procedure Equality Before the Law Access to Justice Property Rights Finality of Judgments Extraordinary Remedies

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 20 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bucyensenge Mende Claude

Applicant

Republic of Rwanda

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether paragraph 4 of Article 161 of Law No 22/2018 violates Articles 15, 29(1)(c), and 34 of the Constitution of Rwanda by prohibiting third-party opposition to judgments of the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court.

Ratio Decidendi

Paragraph 4 of Article 161 of Law No 22/2018 does not violate Articles 15, 29(1)(c), or 34 of the Constitution. The limitation on third-party opposition to judgments of the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court is justified by the need for finality in litigation, applies equally to all, and does not deprive individuals of access to justice or property rights, as alternative remedies exist.

Court Disposition

petition dismissed

Orders

  • The petition by Bucyensenge Mende Claude seeking to annul paragraph 4 of Article 161 of Law No 22/2018 is dismissed for lack of merit.
  • Paragraph 4 of Article 161 of Law No 22/2018 is declared consistent with Articles 15, 29(1)(c), and 34 of the Constitution of Rwanda.