BURIZA v. DIVERSEY EAST&CENTRAL AFRICA Ltd

BURIZA v. DIVERSEY EAST&CENTRAL AFRICA Ltd

The Supreme Court found that although the High Commercial Court registry received additional evidence after the closure of the hearing, the court did not base its decision on that evidence. Therefore, the appeal did not fall within the Supreme Court's jurisdiction under Article 28(2)(3°) of Organic Law No. 03/2012.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOMAA 0024/14//CS
Parties
Applicant: BURIZA Espérance; Respondent: Diversey East & Central Africa Ltd
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
9 January 2015
Case Number
RCOMAA 0024/14//CS
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Review
Outcome
Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Supreme Court, Admissibility of Evidence After Closure of Hearing, Contractual Disputes, Appeal Process
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Jurisdiction of Supreme Court Admissibility of Evidence After Closure of Hearing Contractual Disputes Appeal Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

BURIZA Espérance

Applicant

Diversey East & Central Africa Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Review

  1. 1 Whether the Supreme Court has jurisdiction over the appeal based on evidence submitted after closure of hearing
  2. 2 Whether the High Commercial Court relied on evidence submitted after closure of hearing

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court found that although the High Commercial Court registry received additional evidence after the closure of the hearing, the court did not base its decision on that evidence. Therefore, the appeal did not fall within the Supreme Court's jurisdiction under Article 28(2)(3°) of Organic Law No. 03/2012.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Orders

  • BURIZA Espérance to pay court costs of 100,000 Frw.