BUSHAYIJA v. MAGERWA Ltd

BUSHAYIJA v. MAGERWA Ltd

The Supreme Court held that Bushayija had no new grounds for revision based on injustice, as no evidence was disregarded regarding MAGERWA's obligations, and the delay penalties were properly calculated. MAGERWA's prior objection to standing was already decided and could not be re-litigated. MAGERWA was entitled to partial costs for litigation, but not the full amount claimed.

Citation
RS/REV/INJUST/COM 0003/15/CS
Parties
Applicant: Bushayija Léonard; Respondent: MAGERWA Ltd
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
16 October 2015
Case Number
RS/REV/INJUST/COM 0003/15/CS
Procedural Posture
Commercial Revision for Injustice / Supreme Court Final Judgment
Outcome
Application for revision dismissed; partial costs awarded to respondent.
Legal Topics
Contractual Delay Penalties, Revision for Injustice, Evidentiary Obligations, Standing to Sue, Damages and Costs
Source Language
rw, en
Commercial Law Civil Procedure Contractual Delay Penalties Revision for Injustice Evidentiary Obligations Standing to Sue Damages and Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bushayija Léonard

Applicant

MAGERWA Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial Revision for Injustice / Supreme Court Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant had standing to sue in his own name for a contract signed by his business name ECOMEKI
  2. 2 Whether evidence was disregarded regarding MAGERWA's obligation to inspect and approve materials
  3. 3 Whether delay penalties imposed on ECOMEKI were justified or excessive

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that Bushayija had no new grounds for revision based on injustice, as no evidence was disregarded regarding MAGERWA's obligations, and the delay penalties were properly calculated. MAGERWA's prior objection to standing was already decided and could not be re-litigated. MAGERWA was entitled to partial costs for litigation, but not the full amount claimed.

Court Disposition

Application for revision dismissed; partial costs awarded to respondent.

Orders

  • Objection by MAGERWA Ltd not admitted.
  • Application for revision by Bushayija Léonard dismissed as unfounded.