UBUSHINJACYAHA v. BYUKUSENGE

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. BYUKUSENGE

The application for revision is inadmissible because the cited precedent on sentence reduction is not new evidence as defined by law; it does not relate to facts of the crime or establish innocence, but is a legal argument that should have been raised on appeal. The requirements of Article 197(5) are not met.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RS/REV/RP 00068/2024/CA
Parties
Prosecutor: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Byukusenge Jean Damascène
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
21 November 2025
Case Number
RS/REV/RP 00068/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Judgment on Admissibility of Revision Based on New Evidence
Outcome
Application for revision dismissed as inadmissible
Legal Topics
Revision of Criminal Judgments, New Evidence, Sentencing, Admissibility of Evidence
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Revision of Criminal Judgments New Evidence Sentencing Admissibility of Evidence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecutor

Byukusenge Jean Damascène

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Judgment on Admissibility of Revision Based on New Evidence

  1. 1 Whether the applicant presented new evidence justifying revision of the judgment under Article 197(5) of Law No 027/2019 on criminal procedure
  2. 2 Whether a precedent on sentence reduction for guilty plea constitutes new evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The application for revision is inadmissible because the cited precedent on sentence reduction is not new evidence as defined by law; it does not relate to facts of the crime or establish innocence, but is a legal argument that should have been raised on appeal. The requirements of Article 197(5) are not met.

Court Disposition

Application for revision dismissed as inadmissible

Orders

  • The application for revision by Byukusenge Jean Damascène is not admitted.
  • Byukusenge Jean Damascène is exempted from paying court costs as he is in custody.