CIFTCI v NSHIMIYIMANA N’UNDI

CIFTCI v NSHIMIYIMANA N’UNDI

Both sale agreements (between Sebutinde Edouard and Nshimiyimana Yvon, and between Sebutinde Edouard and Ciftci Inanc) failed to meet the legal requirements for contracts transferring immovable property, as they were not executed before a competent official with all required formalities. Consequently, both are null...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RS/INJUST/RC 00003/2020/SC
Parties
Applicant: Ciftci Inanc; Respondent: Nshimiyimana Yvon; Third Party: Sebutinde Edouard
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
30 September 2021
Case Number
RS/INJUST/RC 00003/2020/SC
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (review on Grounds of Injustice) / Supreme Court Final Judgment
Outcome
Both sale agreements declared null and void; restitution ordered; no damages or interest awarded.
Legal Topics
Sale of Immovable Property, Formal Requirements for Contracts, Nullity of Contracts, Restitution, Review for Injustice
Source Language
rw
Contract Law Property Law Civil Procedure Sale of Immovable Property Formal Requirements for Contracts Nullity of Contracts Restitution Review for Injustice

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ciftci Inanc

Applicant

Nshimiyimana Yvon

Respondent

Sebutinde Edouard

Third Party

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal (review on Grounds of Injustice) / Supreme Court Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the sale agreements between Sebutinde Edouard and Nshimiyimana Yvon or between Sebutinde Edouard and Ciftci Inanc are valid and enforceable; consequences of nullity of such agreements; entitlement to restitution and damages

Ratio Decidendi

Both sale agreements (between Sebutinde Edouard and Nshimiyimana Yvon, and between Sebutinde Edouard and Ciftci Inanc) failed to meet the legal requirements for contracts transferring immovable property, as they were not executed before a competent official with all required formalities. Consequently, both are null and void, and the parties must be restored to their original positions by returning sums paid and property received. No party is entitled to damages or interest as neither prevailed and no fault was established.

Court Disposition

Both sale agreements declared null and void; restitution ordered; no damages or interest awarded.

Orders

  • Sebutinde Edouard to return 12,000,000 Frw to Nshimiyimana Yvon.
  • Sebutinde Edouard to return 30,000 USD to Ciftci Inanc.