DE HAGUENAU ALAIN PAUL vs CHINA ROAD AND BRIDGE CORPORATION LTD (CRBC)

DE HAGUENAU ALAIN PAUL vs CHINA ROAD AND BRIDGE CORPORATION LTD (CRBC)

The applicant failed to provide any evidence directly linking CRBC to the alleged actions threatening his land rights; all documentary evidence referenced actions by Kigali City or other authorities, not CRBC. Therefore, the urgent application lacked merit under the burden of proof principle.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOM00004/2025/CA
Parties
Applicant: DE Haguenau Alain Paul; Respondent: China Road and Bridge Corporation Ltd (CRBC)
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
18 August 2025
Case Number
RCOM00004/2025/CA
Procedural Posture
Commercial Appeal / Interlocutory Application (urgent Motion) Before Court of Appeal
Outcome
Application dismissed for lack of merit.
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Relief, Burden of Proof, Land Use Disputes, Contractual Damages
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Interlocutory Relief Burden of Proof Land Use Disputes Contractual Damages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

DE Haguenau Alain Paul

Applicant

China Road and Bridge Corporation Ltd (CRBC)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial Appeal / Interlocutory Application (urgent Motion) Before Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant demonstrated sufficient evidence to justify an urgent order halting activities on disputed land pending appeal
  2. 2 Whether CRBC was responsible for actions threatening applicant's land rights

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to provide any evidence directly linking CRBC to the alleged actions threatening his land rights; all documentary evidence referenced actions by Kigali City or other authorities, not CRBC. Therefore, the urgent application lacked merit under the burden of proof principle.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed for lack of merit.

Orders

  • The urgent application by DE Haguenau Alain Paul is dismissed as unsubstantiated.
  • The security deposit paid is deemed commensurate with the proceedings.