DJUMAPILI v. I&M Bank Ltd

DJUMAPILI v. I&M Bank Ltd

Since DJUMAPILI John was expressly included as a surety in the Supreme Court's final judgment, any disputes arising from the execution of that judgment, including those raised by him, must be resolved by the Supreme Court itself under Article 208 of Law No 21/2012.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOM 00018/16/CS
Parties
Applicant: DJUMAPILI John; Respondent: I&M Bank-Rwanda Ltd; Interested Party: BIGISHIRO Kambali
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
24 June 2016
Case Number
RCOM 00018/16/CS
Procedural Posture
Commercial / Interlocutory Ruling on Jurisdiction and Preliminary Objection
Outcome
Preliminary objection dismissed; Supreme Court affirms its jurisdiction; case to proceed on merits.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction, Execution of Judgments, Suretyship, Banking Law
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Jurisdiction Execution of Judgments Suretyship Banking Law

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

DJUMAPILI John

Applicant

I&M Bank-Rwanda Ltd

Respondent

BIGISHIRO Kambali

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Commercial / Interlocutory Ruling on Jurisdiction and Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to hear disputes arising from the execution of its own final judgment where the applicant was not a party to the appeal but was affected by the judgment

Ratio Decidendi

Since DJUMAPILI John was expressly included as a surety in the Supreme Court's final judgment, any disputes arising from the execution of that judgment, including those raised by him, must be resolved by the Supreme Court itself under Article 208 of Law No 21/2012.

Court Disposition

Preliminary objection dismissed; Supreme Court affirms its jurisdiction; case to proceed on merits.

Orders

  • Objection by I&M Bank-Rwanda Ltd dismissed
  • Supreme Court has jurisdiction to hear the case