UBUSHINJACYAHA v. DUSABIMANA
The Supreme Court found that the prosecution failed to provide sufficient evidence beyond reasonable doubt to convict Dusabimana Jeannette of infanticide. The confessions were inconsistent and uncorroborated, and the DNA evidence did not establish that the exhumed remains were those of the alleged victim or related to the accused. The principle that doubt benefits the accused was applied, leading to acquittal.
- Citation
- PAA0066/15/CS
- Parties
- Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Dusabimana Jeannette
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Rwanda
- Judgment Date
- 4 January 2019
- Case Number
- PAA0066/15/CS
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction overturned; acquittal entered.
- Legal Topics
- Infanticide, Burden of Proof, Confession, Standard of Evidence, Presumption of Innocence
- Source Language
- rw
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ubushinjacyaha
Prosecution
Dusabimana Jeannette
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Dusabimana Jeannette killed her child Sibomana Samuel (infanticide)
- 2 Whether confessions alone are sufficient evidence for conviction
- 3 Whether prosecution met the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court found that the prosecution failed to provide sufficient evidence beyond reasonable doubt to convict Dusabimana Jeannette of infanticide. The confessions were inconsistent and uncorroborated, and the DNA evidence did not establish that the exhumed remains were those of the alleged victim or related to the accused. The principle that doubt benefits the accused was applied, leading to acquittal.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction overturned; acquittal entered.
Orders
- Dusabimana Jeannette is acquitted of infanticide due to reasonable doubt.
- The prior High Court judgment is set aside in all its parts.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment