EAR/ DIYOSEZI YA SHYIRA v. SECYUGU

EAR/ DIYOSEZI YA SHYIRA v. SECYUGU

The appeal was not admissible because EAR/DIYOSEZI YA SHYIRA had no legal interest in appealing a judgment it had already won, as the High Court had ruled in its favor by refusing to seize the proceeds from the sale of Hotel ISHEMA.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCA 0003/13/CS
Parties
Appellant: EAR/ DIYOSEZI YA SHYIRA; Respondent: Secyugu Pierre Claver
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
15 July 2016
Case Number
RCA 0003/13/CS
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed as inadmissible
Legal Topics
Appeal, Standing, Costs, Damages
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Appeal Standing Costs Damages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

EAR/ DIYOSEZI YA SHYIRA

Appellant

Secyugu Pierre Claver

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether EAR/DIYOSEZI YA SHYIRA had legal interest to appeal a judgment it had won
  2. 2 Whether the respondent is entitled to damages and costs

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was not admissible because EAR/DIYOSEZI YA SHYIRA had no legal interest in appealing a judgment it had already won, as the High Court had ruled in its favor by refusing to seize the proceeds from the sale of Hotel ISHEMA.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed as inadmissible

Orders

  • EAR/DIYOSEZI YA SHYIRA to pay Secyugu Pierre Claver damages of RWF 1,000,000
  • EAR/DIYOSEZI YA SHYIRA to pay court costs of RWF 100,000