ECOBANK RWANDA PLC v WDA

ECOBANK RWANDA PLC v WDA

The Court of Appeal lacks jurisdiction to determine disputes over conflicting final judgments; such jurisdiction lies exclusively with the Supreme Court as established in RC 00001/2023/CS.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOM 00009/2020/CA
Parties
Applicant: ECOBANK RWANDA PLC; Respondent: RWANDA TVET BOARD (formerly WDA); Respondent: ECOTRAP; Respondent: Kambanda Canisius
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
16 December 2024
Case Number
RCOM 00009/2020/CA
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Jurisdictional Ruling
Outcome
case transferred for lack of jurisdiction
Legal Topics
Conflicting Judgments, Jurisdiction, Enforcement of Judgments
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Conflicting Judgments Jurisdiction Enforcement of Judgments

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ECOBANK RWANDA PLC

Applicant

RWANDA TVET BOARD (formerly WDA)

Respondent

ECOTRAP

Respondent

Kambanda Canisius

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Jurisdictional Ruling

  1. 1 Which court has jurisdiction to resolve disputes arising from conflicting final judgments?

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal lacks jurisdiction to determine disputes over conflicting final judgments; such jurisdiction lies exclusively with the Supreme Court as established in RC 00001/2023/CS.

Court Disposition

case transferred for lack of jurisdiction

Orders

  • The case file RCOM 00009/2020/CA shall be transmitted to the Supreme Court for determination.
  • Court fees are suspended.