ECOBANK RWANDA S.A v. KAJUGA

ECOBANK RWANDA S.A v. KAJUGA

The Supreme Court held that the five-year prescription for claiming interest on the loan began when the debt became immediately payable, not at contract termination. Since more than five years elapsed without ECOBANK RWANDA S.A demanding interest, the claim for interest was prescribed. The Court also found that Kajuga was not entitled to damages for being involved in the proceedings, as he failed to reveal sufficient grounds. The principal and arrears were confirmed, and procedural fees partially awarded to Kajuga.

Citation
RCOMA 0017/11/SC
Parties
Appellant: ECOBANK RWANDA S.A; Respondent/cross Appellant: KAJUGA Jean Wycliff; Guarantor/removed Party: SONARWA
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
14 January 2014
Case Number
RCOMA 0017/11/SC
Procedural Posture
Commercial Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal partially allowed; principal and arrears confirmed; interest claim prescribed; procedural fees partially awarded.
Legal Topics
Loan Interest Prescription, Damages for Wrongful Proceedings, Calculation of Interest on Loans, Compensation of Debts
Source Language
en, rw
Commercial Law Civil Procedure Loan Interest Prescription Damages for Wrongful Proceedings Calculation of Interest on Loans Compensation of Debts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ECOBANK RWANDA S.A

Appellant

KAJUGA Jean Wycliff

Respondent/cross Appellant

SONARWA

Guarantor/removed Party

Procedural Posture

Commercial Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether ECOBANK RWANDA S.A is entitled to claim interest on the loan after five years without demand
  2. 2 Whether KAJUGA Jean Wycliff is entitled to damages for being involved in court proceedings without grounds

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that the five-year prescription for claiming interest on the loan began when the debt became immediately payable, not at contract termination. Since more than five years elapsed without ECOBANK RWANDA S.A demanding interest, the claim for interest was prescribed. The Court also found that Kajuga was not entitled to damages for being involved in the proceedings, as he failed to reveal sufficient grounds. The principal and arrears were confirmed, and procedural fees partially awarded to Kajuga.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal partially allowed; principal and arrears confirmed; interest claim prescribed; procedural fees partially awarded.

Orders

  • KAJUGA Jean Wycliff to pay ECOBANK RWANDA S.A 50,790,979 Frw.
  • ECOBANK RWANDA S.A to pay court fees of 35,150 Frw within eight days.