ENTREPRISE DE CONSTRUCTION SEBURIKOKO v. BIA OVERSEAS SA

ENTREPRISE DE CONSTRUCTION SEBURIKOKO v. BIA OVERSEAS SA

The Court held that the contractual clause allowed the seller to bring proceedings before any competent court, including Rwandan courts, and that the appellant failed to prove the debt had been paid by an insurer. Therefore, the appeal lacked merit and the lower court's decision was upheld.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOMAA 00033/2019/CA
Parties
Appellant: ENTREPRISE DE CONSTRUCTION SEBURIKOKO; Respondent: BIA OVERSEAS SA
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
13 November 2020
Case Number
RCOMAA 00033/2019/CA
Procedural Posture
Commercial Appeal / Court of Appeal Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; lower court judgment affirmed.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction Clauses, Loan Agreements, Burden of Proof, Insurance Payment Defenses
Source Language
rw
Commercial Law Contract Law Civil Procedure Jurisdiction Clauses Loan Agreements Burden of Proof Insurance Payment Defenses

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ENTREPRISE DE CONSTRUCTION SEBURIKOKO

Appellant

BIA OVERSEAS SA

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial Appeal / Court of Appeal Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Rwandan courts had jurisdiction despite a contractual clause favoring Belgian courts
  2. 2 Whether the debt claimed by BIA OVERSEAS SA had already been paid by an insurer

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the contractual clause allowed the seller to bring proceedings before any competent court, including Rwandan courts, and that the appellant failed to prove the debt had been paid by an insurer. Therefore, the appeal lacked merit and the lower court's decision was upheld.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; lower court judgment affirmed.

Orders

  • The judgment of the High Commercial Court (RCOMA 00760/2017/CHC/HCC) dated 31/05/2018 is upheld in all its provisions.
  • Appellant to pay costs as incurred in this appeal.