GAKIRE v. SONARWA S.A

GAKIRE v. SONARWA S.A

The Supreme Court held that the insurer (SONARWA) is not liable to pay under the 'tous risques' insurance policy because the vehicle was being driven by a person (the applicant's husband) who did not have a valid driving license at the time of the accident. The Court found that the evidence provided by SONARWA,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOMA 0087/11/CS
Parties
Applicant: Gakire Kabeho Viviane; Respondent: SONARWA S.A
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
19 April 2013
Case Number
RCOMA 0087/11/CS
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (insurance Contract Dispute) / Supreme Court Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Motor Vehicle Insurance, Insurance Claims, Validity of Driving License, Burden of Proof, Contractual Exclusions
Source Language
rw
Insurance Law Contract Law Civil Procedure Motor Vehicle Insurance Insurance Claims Validity of Driving License Burden of Proof Contractual Exclusions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gakire Kabeho Viviane

Applicant

SONARWA S.A

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal (insurance Contract Dispute) / Supreme Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the insurer (SONARWA) is liable to pay under a 'tous risques' insurance policy when the vehicle was driven by a person without a valid driving license at the time of the accident.
  2. 2 Whether the evidence provided by SONARWA regarding the invalidity of the driving license is sufficient and properly admitted.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that the insurer (SONARWA) is not liable to pay under the 'tous risques' insurance policy because the vehicle was being driven by a person (the applicant's husband) who did not have a valid driving license at the time of the accident. The Court found that the evidence provided by SONARWA, including official responses from Ugandan authorities, was sufficient to establish the absence of a valid license. The contractual exclusion applied, and the applicant's arguments regarding the scope of 'tous risques' coverage and the alleged procedural defects in proving forgery were rejected.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal by Gakire Kabeho Viviane is dismissed.
  • The judgment of the Commercial High Court is affirmed.