GATAMA N’ABANDI v. METCORP Ltd

GATAMA N’ABANDI v. METCORP Ltd

The appeal was inadmissible because the applicants had already lost on the same grounds in two lower courts, and the exclusivity clause did not relieve them from the obligation to repay the loan. No evidence was provided that METCORP Ltd breached the exclusivity clause. The applicants are liable for the loan,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOMAA 00102/2022/CA (
Parties
Applicant: Gatama Pierre; Applicant: Gasabato Adeline; Applicant: COPROCO Group SARL; Respondent: METCORP Ltd
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
30 June 2023
Case Number
RCOMAA 00102/2022/CA (
Procedural Posture
Commercial Appeal / Court of Appeal Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed as inadmissible; lower court judgment affirmed.
Legal Topics
Loan Agreements, Breach of Contract, Jurisdiction, Appeals, Damages, Attorney Fees
Source Language
rw
Commercial Law Contract Law Civil Procedure Loan Agreements Breach of Contract Jurisdiction Appeals Damages +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gatama Pierre

Applicant

Gasabato Adeline

Applicant

COPROCO Group SARL

Applicant

METCORP Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial Appeal / Court of Appeal Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the appeal is admissible given prior judgments on the same grounds
  2. 2 Whether the exclusivity clause relieves applicants from loan repayment
  3. 3 Whether METCORP Ltd breached contract justifying non-payment

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was inadmissible because the applicants had already lost on the same grounds in two lower courts, and the exclusivity clause did not relieve them from the obligation to repay the loan. No evidence was provided that METCORP Ltd breached the exclusivity clause. The applicants are liable for the loan, interests, and litigation costs.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed as inadmissible; lower court judgment affirmed.

Orders

  • Appeal by COPROCO Group SARL, Gatama Pierre, and Gasabato Adeline is not admitted.
  • No change to the decision of the High Commercial Court in RCOMA 00278/2021/HCC of 27/05/2022.