GENERAL ELECTRICALS AND MECHANICALS RWANDA (GEM RWANDA) Ltd vs. FAIR CONSTRUCTION Ltd

GENERAL ELECTRICALS AND MECHANICALS RWANDA (GEM RWANDA) Ltd vs. FAIR CONSTRUCTION Ltd

The Court of Appeal held that although the value of the subject matter exceeded the statutory threshold for jurisdiction, the appeal was inadmissible because GEM Rwanda Ltd lost in both lower courts on the same grounds—failure to prove its claims. Therefore, the procedural bar under Article 52(3) of Law No 30/2018...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOMAA00060/2021/CA
Parties
Appellant: GENERAL ELECTRICALS AND MECHANICALS RWANDA (GEM RWANDA) Ltd; Respondent: FAIR CONSTRUCTION Ltd
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
28 October 2022
Case Number
RCOMAA00060/2021/CA
Procedural Posture
Commercial Appeal / Court of Appeal Ruling on Admissibility and Merits
Outcome
Appeal dismissed as inadmissible for lack of jurisdiction; costs awarded to respondent.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Appellate Courts, Contract Enforcement, Damages, Procedural Bars to Appeal
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Jurisdiction of Appellate Courts Contract Enforcement Damages Procedural Bars to Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

GENERAL ELECTRICALS AND MECHANICALS RWANDA (GEM RWANDA) Ltd

Appellant

FAIR CONSTRUCTION Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial Appeal / Court of Appeal Ruling on Admissibility and Merits

  1. 1 Whether the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction based on the value of the subject matter or damages awarded
  2. 2 Whether the appeal is admissible when the same grounds were decided in both lower courts
  3. 3 Whether GEM Rwanda Ltd is entitled to payment and damages for alleged breach of contract

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held that although the value of the subject matter exceeded the statutory threshold for jurisdiction, the appeal was inadmissible because GEM Rwanda Ltd lost in both lower courts on the same grounds—failure to prove its claims. Therefore, the procedural bar under Article 52(3) of Law No 30/2018 applied, and the appeal could not be entertained.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed as inadmissible for lack of jurisdiction; costs awarded to respondent.

Orders

  • GEM Rwanda Ltd to pay FAIR Construction Ltd 500,000 Frw as advocate's fee and 200,000 Frw as costs for this appeal.
  • Court fees paid by GEM Rwanda Ltd correspond to the actual expenses incurred.